|
|
SUBMIT AN ARTICLE If you would like to submit an article to the Accident Reconstruction Newsletter, please email the ARC Network: arc@accidentreconstruction.com |
|
| RETURN TO FEBRUARY 2004 NEWSLETTER Effects of Head Restraint Position on Neck Injury in Rear Impact Although whiplash is typically classified as a minor injury, the economic cost ofwhiplash has been estimated at roughly $4.5 billion per year in the United States. International research efforts have included computational modeling, crash reconstructions, biomechanical testing of animals and human cadavers, and experimental rear impact tests using both anthropomorphic dummies and human subjects. Despite these efforts, the mechanisms and tolerances of whiplash injuries are still largely unknown. This paper uses a computational modeling approach to better understand the effects of head restraint position on the risk of cervical injury under rear impact conditions. Both height and backset are varied over a wide range, while various engineering parameters believed to be related to cervical injury risk are examined. Simulation results for this model of a 50’ percentile male indicate that for a head restraint height of 3 1.5 inches, the relative rotations, relative displacements, tensile loads, shear loads, bending moments, NE values and NIC values are relatively low for backsets of about 2 inches or less. Similarly, the results indicate that for a head restraint height of 29.5 inches, the value of these parameters are relatively low for backsets of 1 inch or less. These lower values suggest that a head restraint position that is higher and closer to the head may lead to a reduced risk of cervical spine injury. ### |
||
| Please direct any questions regarding this issue of the Accident Reconstruction Newsletter to the ARC Network © 2004 ARC Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Any comments, questions or suggestions should be e-mailed to the ARC Network. ARC
NETWORK QUICK LINKS
|
||