| The Accident Reconstruction Newsletter SUBMIT AN ARTICLE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| December 2006 - Accident Reconstruction Newsletter Welcome to the December 2006 edition of the Accident Reconstruction Newsletter. It's hard to believe the year is almost over. It has been a fast and furious year for the ARC Network. We have received a record number of new members, launched a new magazine (Collision), launched a new conference (CDR User's Conference) which sold out in record time, and had the best turn-out ever for our ARC-CSI Crash Conference! We even had time to offer some really great deals to our current members (like a free version of Jeff Muttart's Drive3 software offered at REC-TEC). We are now working on Vol. 2 Issue 1 of Collision Magazine and also getting ready for the 2nd annual CDR User's Conference. The media kit for Collision is available as a PDF Download directly from the web site. The conference registrations have been pouring in, but there are still some spaces left. Please visit www.crashconferences.com/cdrconference/2007/2007cdr.html for complete information. A couple notes about the upcoming CDR User's Conference:
We are also glad to announce that we are beginning the preparation for the 2007 ARC-CSI Crash Conference. Once again the conference will be held in Las Vegas and we will be keeping the price at $599 for those who register early. We will be opening registration for ARC-CSI in January 2007. The ARC Network is planning on adding some new features to the members only section next year, if there is anything you would like to see improved or added, please send us an email. Thank you for making the ARC Network the number one organization and web site for accident reconstruction and traffic investigation. Sincerely, Scott Baker |
Inside this Issue:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
CITA RESEARCH STUDY PROGRAMME Introduction Modern motor vehicle drive systems are characterised by a multitude of complex control and regulating systems optimally adapting the drive characteristics to the respective driving condition. Known systems are electronic devices for regulating the brake system to obtain increased safety by means of automatic slip regulation when braking (ABS, ESP etc.) or accelerating. Anti Lock Braking Systems (ABS) became a standard device in all actual vehicles. At present a high rate of vehicles equipped with ABS with ages up to ten or twelve years are on the road. The existing information about the availability and reliability of these systems is insufficient. Furthermore, it is not defined, how these systems can be effectively checked on their correct function. At present, the efficiency of these systems is only tested after the production of the car and no further tests or periodic checking occur during it's whole lifetime. Only self-checks are done by the systems self diagnosis routine and the results are documented in the fault memory. It is unknown, whether these self checks are sufficient to cover most of the failures which appear in the system, or if additional efficiency tests are necessary. Nevertheless, this information is necessary for the estimation about the influences of Therefore, in this study the functional behaviour of older ABS systems is examined with a four wheel ABS Test Bench from TUEV Rheinland. A large number of vehicles (>250) is tested to ensure the correctness of the statistics. The vehicles for the tests are acquired during the periodical inspection tests at the TUEV Kraftfahrt testing facilities. A test sequence for the four wheel test bench is defined to make the detection of failures and discrepancies of the ABS possible. After data collection, a detailed evaluation of the data is carried out. The result of the evaluation determines the rate of defective ABS. The functional behaviour during the efficiency test is analysed and the appeared failures are compared with the fault memory content before and after the efficiency test on the test bench. Herewith, important information of the failure detection rates of the two test types is generated. Furthermore, it is investigated, if the implementation of the tests in the given procedure of the periodic testing is practicable. A Brief History of Vehicle Dynamics: Why Tires are So Important Overview
Updated Review Of Potential Test Procedures For Fmvss No. 208 Background The objective of a crash test for Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208 is to measure how well a passenger vehicle would protect its occupants in the event of a serious real world frontal crash. This is sometimes referred to as the crashworthiness of a vehicle. This report reviews potential test procedures for evaluating frontal crashworthiness. Structural design for crashworthiness seeks to mitigate two adverse effects of a crash – (1) rapid deceleration of the occupant compartment, and (2) crush of the occupant compartment survival space. In a severe crash, the speed of a vehicle often decreases from its travel speed to zero in a hundred thousandths of a second. One important way to minimize the injury consequences of this abrupt change in velocity is to extend the amount of time necessary to slow the vehicle down – the less abrupt the change in velocity, the lower the crash forces on the occupant. The front end of vehicles are designed to crumple in a controlled manner in a collision to give their occupants the necessary additional time to safely decelerate in a crash. Note that the controlled crush or crumple of the front-end, a safety positive feature, is totally different from the crush or collapse of the actual occupant compartment – which is to be avoided. At a minimum, partial collapse of the structural cage which surrounds the occupant allows vehicle parts (e.g., the engine or steering mechanism) to “intrude” into the occupant space and strike the occupant causing injury. In extremely severe collisions, the occupant compartment may suffer a catastrophic collapse, and allow the occupant to be crushed. The degradation of the occupant compartment survival space is measured by intrusion. The occupant Real and Simulated Crashworthiness Tests On Buses Abstract This paper discusses the design aspects of bus frontal impact behavior as one of the main subjects of bus crashworthiness and surveys conditions and results of previous full impact laboratory tests comparing the FEM simulation results carried out on a Hungarian Ikarus bus. Clarifying the adequate background gives possibilities for checking bus passive safety solutions by computer and the best utilizable resolutions can be applied in the standardized production. This paper shows frontal impact test arrangements of a 10 tons’ city bus with three different impact speeds and computer simulation versions of these real tests. It gives possibilities to compare the test results to the requirements of current bus regulations. M3Consulting - Brake Insite Brake Insite by M3consulting Brake Insite is a comprehensive air brake evaluation system designed by M3's engineers. They saw the need for an accurate, verifiable way to determine the condition of a vehicle's air brake system following a collision.
To find out more contact Alan Moore at 321-946-1283
or alan@brakeinsite.com Proceedings 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced safety of vehicles Introduction The ESV Program originated more than thirty years ago under the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society, and was implemented through bilateral agreements between the governments of the United States, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, Japan, and Sweden. The participating nations agreed to develop experimental safety vehicles to advance the state-of-the-art technology in automotive engineering and to meet periodically to exchange information on their progress. Since its inception the number of international partners has grown to include the governments of Canada, Australia, The Netherlands, Hungary, Poland, and two international organizations -- the European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee, and the European Commission. A representative from each country and organization serves as a Government Focal Point in support of the Conference. The research papers and status reports contained on this CD-ROM are unedited and address efforts worldwide relevant to the reduction of motor vehicle related fatalities and injuries.
Accident Reconstruction Publications for SaleLarry Beveridge is selling his collection of Accident Reconstruction books and magazines. The complete list is detailed below (added two new books to the list). Contact: Larry Beveridge Formula Workbook for Traffic Accident Investigation and Reconstruction by Gary L. Stephens. Equations & Formulas for the Traffic Accident Investigator and Reconstructionist by C. Gregory Russell. Pedestrian Accident Reconstruction and Litigation 2nd Edition, Jerry J. Eubanks & Paul J. Hill Esq. Traffic Accident Investigation Manual Reprinted 1976—J. Stannard Baker Lamp Examination for On/Off in Traffic Accidents 1977 Edition—J. Stannard Baker Basic Motion Equations Used in Traffic Accident Reconstruction 1990—Lynn B. Fricke Motor Vehicle Accident Reconstruction SP-777 1989 S.A.F. Global Mobility Database Traffic Accident Reconstruction 1990—Volume 2— Lynn B. Fricke Impact Velocity From Conservation of Linear Momentum For the Traffic Accident Investigator & Reconstructionist Make offer Like new condition The Traffic Accident Investigation Manual Automobile Handbook- 4th Edition Low Speed Automobile Accidents, Accident Reconstruction and Occupant Kinematics, Dynamics and Biomechanics Alan Watts, PhD, Dave R. Atkinson, BS, Corey Hennessy, MA Forensic Accident Investigation 1995—Thomas Bohan, Arthur Damask Forensic Aspects of Driver Perception & Response Paul L. Olson Forensic Accident Investigation 2 1997—Thomas Bohan, Arthur Damask Accident Reconstruction Journal 1989-2003 (Bi monthly) Accident Investigation Quarterly 1989-2003 I will sell the entire collection for
$1,000.00 plus shipping (including magazines) All items listed are plus shipping costs Evaluation of Event Data Recorders In Full Systems Crash Tests Abstract The Event Data Recorders (EDRs), now being installed as standard equipment by several automakers, are increasingly being used as an independent measurement of crash severity, which avoids many of the difficulties of traditional crash reconstruction methods. Little has been published however about the accuracy of the data recorded by the current generation of EDRs in a real world collision. Previous studies have been limited to a single automaker and full frontal barrier impacts at a single test speed. This paper presents the results of a methodical evaluation of the accuracy of new-generation (2000-2004) EDRs from General Motors, Ford, and Toyota in laboratory crash tests across a wide spectrum of impact conditions. The study evaluates the performance of EDRs by comparison with the laboratory-grade accelerometers mounted onboard test vehicles subjected to crash loading over a wide range of impact speeds, collision partners, and crash modes including full frontal barrier, frontal-offset, side impact, and angled frontal-offset impacts. The study concludes that, if the EDR recorded the full crash pulse, the EDR average error in frontal crash pulses was just under six percent when compared with crash test accelerometers. In many cases, however, current EDRs do not record the complete crash pulse resulting in a substantial underestimate of delta-V. The Accuracy Of Winsmash Delta-V Estimates: The Influence of Vehicle Type, Stiffness, and Impact Mode Abstract The objective of this paper is to investigate the accuracy of WinSmash delta-V estimates as a function of crash mode, vehicle body type, and vehicle stiffness. The accuracy of WinSmash delta-V estimates was evaluated for 121 NASS/CDS 2000-2003 cases for which direct measurements of delta-V had been retrieved from an Event Data Recorder on the case vehicle. WinSmash was found to underestimate delta-V by 23% on average. WinSmash was found to be most accurate in crashes involving full frontal engagement of the vehicle structure. When using categorical stiffness coefficients, the accuracy of delta-V estimates was found to be a strong function of vehicle type. WinSmash underestimated delta-V for pickup trucks by only 3%, but underestimated delta-V for front-wheel drive cars by 31%. The use of vehicle-specific stiffness coefficients improved the accuracy of the longitudinal delta-V estimate. The single most important factor in improving WinSmash accuracy was the inclusion of restitution. After adjusting for restitution, WinSmash underestimated delta-V in frontal crashes by only 1% on average. THE WINSMASH COMPUTER CODE estimates vehicle change in velocity, or delta-V, based on post-crash measurements of vehicle deformation. Delta-V is a crucial component of accident reconstruction, and is widely used as a measure of crash severity in crash statistics databases, e.g. the National Automotive Sampling System / Crashworthiness Data System (NASS/CDS). Computation of delta-V using WinSmash and other derivatives of the CRASH3 code is not always successful or accurate. Smith and Noga (1982) reconstructed 27 vehicle-to-vehicle crash tests using CRASH3, and compared the results with the delta-V measured by crash test instrumentation. Their study concluded that CRASH3 underestimated delta-V by approximately 10% on average, and exhibited a fair amount of scatter surrounding that average. O’Neill et al (1996) compared CRASH3 delta-V estimates with impact speed in 41 frontal offset barrier crash tests, and found that CRASH3 produced a delta-V estimate that was approximately 33% less than the impact speed of the collision. Nolan et al (1998) confirmed this finding using SMASH, a CRASH3 derivative, and observed that the tendency to underestimate delta-V in frontal offset crash tests varied with vehicle type. Stucki and Fessahaie (1998) examined WinSmash performance in staged collisions with varying degrees of offset, and concluded that decreased vehicle frontal overlap led to greater delta-V underestimates. Lenard et al (1998) investigated the accuracy of CRASH3 with European cars. In 64 km/hr frontal offset crash tests, this study found that frontal offset impacts resulted in an average computed delta-V that was 7 km/hr lower than the actual delta-V. The installation of Event Data Recorders (EDRs) in many production vehicles provides an alternative method to crash testing for evaluation of CRASH3 which may better capture the many complexities of a real-world crash. Current EDRs record either vehicle acceleration or change in velocity as a function of time during the crash event. These direct measurements of delta-V can be used to evaluate the accuracy of WinSmash or CRASH3 delta-V estimates. In a study of 65 real-world crashed vehicles, Gabler et al (2004) compared the delta-V measured by Event Data Recorders with the delta-V estimated by WinSmash, and found that WinSmash underestimates longitudinal delta-V by 25% on average. The number of cases in the study was too small however to explore the reasons for this inaccuracy. In this paper, this issue is revisited with an expanded EDR data set to determine the reasons for WinSmash inaccuracy. Advertising in the ARC Network
Vetronix Crash Data Retrieval
System
>> Click
here for Complete Information ARC Network New Members
Events, Conferences & Seminars
Accident Reconstruction News Articles
Each month the ARC Network
continues to grow with new memberships and contacts. The ARC Network would like to thank everyone
for continuing to make the |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Please
direct any questions regarding this issue of the Accident Reconstruction
Newsletter to ©
2006 ARC Network, LLC. All rights reserved. ARC
NETWORK QUICK LINKS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||