Volume
Six, Issue 8
AUGUST 2004
|
The
Accident Reconstruction Newsletter
is a monthly newsletter delivered electronically to over 8000 recipients.
If
you would like to receive the newsletter,
simply sign our guest
book
SUBMIT
AN ARTICLE
If
you would like to submit an article to the Accident Reconstruction Newsletter,
please email the ARC Network:
arc@accidentreconstruction.com
|

Your resource for accident reconstruction and traffic
accident investigation. |
| Infants
are eight (8) times more likely to be responsible for accident-causing
distractions than do adult passengers
(source UNC/AAA)
COLORADO SPRINGS COLORADO, July 27, 2004. In the last few years the University
of North Carolina (UNC) under the auspices' of the AAA Foundation for
Highway Safety conducted a multiphase study dealing with causal relations
between driver distraction and road accidents. The study got impetus from
the fact that there are many new technologies in automobiles that can,
and do, distract drivers. Of particular interest was cell telephone because
of their rapid proliferation, and because of their visibility.
The last phase of the UNC/AAA study was released in early 2004 with a
strong indictment regarding the Government push for all infants to be
placed in the back seat. The study which placed monitors in cars, a very
effective means for observing events without prejudice, clearly indicates
that "properly" placed infants in the back seats of vehicles
are eight (8) times as likely to cause crashes than are adult passenger.
The study also concluded that older children were four times as likely
to cause accident-generating distractions, as do adult passengers.
Since there is no question about the dangerous situation created by placing
infants in the back seat, especially when only said infant and a single
caretaker/driver are in a car; it is time to have a study dedicated to
infant distraction, not as a subset of another studies. Relegating the
subject of infant distractions to a mere segment of another study, gives
a skewed picture of dangers cause by the situation.
It is generally recognized that when a study, or a control, is focused
on a single subject, the effort can be much more effective than when it
is a subset of another study, or control. This, if you will, is very much
like having a computer manage one well defined and focused task versus
a general purpose computer which is allowed to incidentally mange an additional
task in the background...
Due to the severity of driver-distractions due to infants "properly"
placed in the back seat, especially in those cases when they are in a
vehicle with only a driver, GAI will be proposing to the AAA Foundation
for Highway Safety, and to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) a program to demonstrate the urgency of finding means for alleviating
the problem of infants in the back seat. GAI hereby invites responsible
child safety advocates who have information and knowledge to share on
the subject to participate in this very important study.
GAI proposes an approach in which a large numbers of vehicles leaving
on trips ("on-road") with infants be studied to establish the
ratio of infants in the back, versus the front seat. Then, with that baseline
data on hand, it is proposed the national database will be studied from
crash sites to see if the ratio of infants in the back versus front seats
shifts, as previous work demonstrated. Should, as expected, the number
proves as severe previous work suggested, NHTSA and the automotive industry
will be urged to come up with a better solution which will allow infants
to ride in the front seat, with, or without the present of airbags, and
do so without additional delays.
For additional information
please contact Dan
Goor, at: buppahgai@aol.com
ARC Network Member
|
|