The ARC Network
The ARC Network


Book Store | Discussion Forum | Education Directory | Events Calendar | Expert Search
Members Only | News | Newsletters | Organizations | Police Directory | Products | Research | Services

Accident Reconstruction Newsletter

Analysis of Lane Change Crashes
Performed by John A.Volpe National Transportation System Center, Cambridge, MA,
Sponsored by National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington D.C
March 2003, DOT HS 809 571

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report defines the problem of lane change crashes in the United States (U.S.) based on data from the 1999 National Automotive Sampling System/General Estimates System (GES) crash database of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The results from this analysis provide a basis for related future research in the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Intelligent Vehicle Initiative to solve traffic safety problems through the development and deployment of vehicle-based and vehicle-infrastructure cooperative countermeasure systems using advanced technologies. Lane change crashes (or more properly, the lane change family of crashes) are defined in this report as two-vehicle crashes that occur when one vehicle encroaches into the path of another vehicle initially on a parallel path with the first vehicle and traveling in the same direction. Such encroachment results from various vehicle maneuvers including typical lane change, merge, pass, drift, turn, and leave or enter a parking position. There were 539,000 twovehicle lane change crashes in 1999 based on GES data, or about 9% of all police-reported motor vehicle crashes. This report breaks down these crashes into major pre-crash scenarios and describes the characteristics of each scenario in terms of vehicle types involved, physical setting, crash contributing factors, and injury severity.

Lane change crashes mostly consist of the following seven pre-crash scenarios, ranked in a descending order in terms of their frequency of occurrence in 1999:

  1. Two vehicles on parallel paths; one intentionally changes lanes and collides with other vehicle: 207,000 (typical lane change).
  2. Two vehicles on parallel paths; one turns across the path of the other at a roadway junction: 89,000 (turning at junction).
  3. Two vehicles on parallel paths (both going straight/both turning left/both turning right/both negotiating curve); one drifts into another’s lane with no apparent reason: 62,000 (drifting).
  4. Two vehicles on parallel paths; one turning at a roadway junction and one passing: 46,000 (turning combined with passing).
  5. Two vehicles on parallel paths; one moves into the other’s lane to pass the other, or to pass a third vehicle: 27,000 (passing).
  6. One vehicle leaves parked position and sideswipes/is sideswiped by another vehicle in lane into which the first vehicle is trying to merge: 25,000 (leaving parked position).
  7. One vehicle merges into the lane of another from entrance to limited access highway and/or other similar entrance, and sideswipes/is sideswiped by the other vehicle: 19,000 (merging).

The seven most common pre-crash scenarios accounted for about 88% of all two-vehicle lane change crashes. A large share (10%) of “typical lane change” crashes involved large trucks (medium and heavy trucks) changing lanes and light vehicles (passenger cars, sport utility vehicles, vans, and pickups) going straight; in contrast, about 5% of these crashes involved the reverse combination. Similarly, trucks were turning and light vehicles were going straight in 10% of the “turning at junction” crashes; however, the reverse combination was reported in only 1% of these crashes. The highest involvement of trucks was observed in the “merging” scenario, accounting for 42% of these crashes. Buses (transit and inter-city buses, not school buses) were mostly associated with in “drifting” and “leaving parked position” scenarios.

The physical setting of the seven scenarios was described in terms of the number of travel lanes per direction of travel, crash relation to junction, posted speed limit, roadway alignment, and roadway profile. Moreover, this report examined the factors that might have contributed to the crash in each of the seven scenarios using available GES variables. The list of factors included driver distraction, vision obstruction, speeding, traffic violation, hit and run, and environmental factors such as night and adverse weather conditions. Finally, the maximum injury severity per crash was analyzed which revealed that 14% of lane change crashes resulted in some form of injury.

The Full Report is available for download in PDF. The size is 261K and is 52 pages.
Download the Full Report

Return to August 2003 Newsletter


ARC Store | Bookstore | Discussion Forum | Education Directory | Events Calendar | Expert Search
Members Only | News | Newsletters | Organizations | Police Directory | Products | Research | Services

The ARC Network
For any comments, questions or suggestions please e-mail the ARC Network.
Click here for Disclaimer and Terms and Conditions Information
© 1997-2003 The Accident Reconstruction Communications Network. All rights reserved.

Home | Contact Us | About Us | Site Map | Membership | Advertising | Guest Book

home contact us about us site map membership advertising guest book ARC Store discussion forum education directory events calendar expert directory news and newsletters organizations products research services members log on