|
Research
/ Crash Tests Lawyers
and Judges Low-Speed Accident Reconstruction and Litigation Seminar/Crash
Test
This conference
was held on October 22 - 23, 1999 and included the following speakers:
- Mark Gomez,
Ph.D. - Biomechanical Aspects of Low-Speed Accidents
- Rob Stearns
- Fraud in Low-Speed Accidents: Investigative and Ethical Aspects.
Rob Stearns is a Platinum Member of the ARC Network. You can visit
his web site at www.accidentreconstruction.com/rstearns
- Peter Rast,
Ph.D. - Investigation: Documenting and Preserving the Evidence
- Constance
Fain, Esq. - Legal Ethics
- Alan Immerman,
D.C. - The Role of Chiropractors in Low-Speed Cases
- Alan Watts,
Ph.D. - The Role of Engineers and Physicists in Low-Speed Accident
Cases. You can purchase Alan's book in the ARC
Network Bookstore or here.
- Jerry J.
Eubanks, ACTAR - Low-Speed Vehicle Crash Tests. The results
and video from these tests are included below.
- Nick Vakula,
Esq. - Daubert/Kumho Challenges: Plaintiff's Perspective
- Rip Harwood,
Esq. - Daubert/Kumho Challenges: The Defense Perspective
- Alan Watts,
Ph.D. - Reconstructing the Accident
- Mark Johnson,
Ph.D. - Demonstrative Evidence in Low-Speed Accident Cases
- Mock Cross
Examination with Panel Discussion
This conference
was conducted by Lawyers and Judges Publishing Company. For more
information please visit their web
site
Crash Test
Information
Test
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Date: October 23, 1999
Vehicle 1 (target
vehicle):
1985 Chevrolet Cavalier 4 door Red
VIN 1G1JC69P8FJ207746
Weight 2336 lbs with driver for tests 1-9 weight 2546 lbs
Vehicle 2 (bullet
vehicle):
1986 Dodge Charger SE 2 door Brown
VIN 1B3BZ44C1GD183777
Weight 2167 lbs with driver for tests 10-15 weigth 2377 lbs
Rider/driver
co-coordinator: W.R. "Rusty" Haight
Co-coordinator: Jerry J. Eubanks
Crash Test Data:
|
Test
|
Bullet
In |
Bullet
Out |
Target
Out |
deltaV
V1 |
deltaV
V2 |
Energy
Damage |
Restitu
tion |
Video
(mpeg) |
|
|
Vel.
(fps) |
Time
(sec) |
Vel.
(fps) |
Time
(sec) |
Vel.
(fps) |
Time
(sec) |
Vel.
(fps) |
Vel.
(fps) |
ft-lbs
|
|
|
|
1
|
5.96
|
0.04
|
1.65
|
0.21
|
3.65
|
0.27
|
4.31
|
3.65
|
734
|
448
|
1182
|
.34
|
View
Video (409K) |
|
2
|
7.67
|
0.00
|
2.12
|
0.18
|
4.30
|
0.14
|
5.55
|
4.3
|
1218
|
6.22
|
1840
|
.28
|
View
Video (341K) |
|
3
|
No 5th
Wheel |
View
Video (481K) |
|
4
|
4.68
|
-0.04
|
1.07
|
0.10
|
2.67
|
.15
|
3.61
|
2.67
|
515
|
240
|
755
|
.34
|
View
Video (521K) |
|
5
|
5.84
|
-0.02
|
2.0
|
0.11
|
3.63
|
0.18
|
3.84
|
3.63
|
583
|
443
|
1026
|
.28
|
View
Video (341K) |
|
6
|
6.15
|
-0.02
|
1.63
|
0.10
|
2.86
|
.11
|
4.52
|
2.86
|
808
|
275
|
1083
|
.20
|
View
Video (341K) |
|
7
|
9.65
|
0.02
|
2.76
|
0.16
|
5.75
|
0.14
|
689
|
5.75
|
1877
|
1113
|
2990
|
.31
|
View
Video (341K) |
|
8
|
9.50
|
-0.10
|
2.54
|
0.01
|
5.50
|
-0.02
|
6.96
|
5.5
|
1915
|
1018
|
2933
|
.31
|
View
Video (377K) |
|
9
|
12.1
|
0.06
|
3.34
|
0.19
|
7.04
|
0.15
|
8.76
|
7.04
|
3034
|
1668
|
4701
|
.31
|
View
Video (341K) |
|
10
|
12.62
|
-0.14
|
3.58
|
-0.04
|
7.58
|
-0.05
|
9.04
|
7.58
|
3231
|
1933
|
5164
|
.32
|
View
Video (321K) |
|
11
|
3.90
|
0.35
|
1.36
|
0.43
|
2.49
|
0.52
|
2.54
|
2.49
|
255
|
208
|
463
|
.29
|
View
Video (557K) |
|
12
|
8.17
|
0.11
|
2.54
|
0.20
|
3.09
|
0.2
|
5.63
|
3.09
|
1253
|
321
|
1574
|
.07
|
View
Video (637K) |
|
13
|
12.85
|
0.02
|
4.60
|
0.13
|
5.37
|
0.09
|
5.63
|
3.09
|
1253
|
321
|
1574
|
.07
|
View
Video (365K) |
|
14
|
16.06
|
.21
|
8.74
|
0.69
|
3.32
|
0.70
|
8.25
|
5.37
|
2691
|
970
|
3661
|
n/a -
.34* |
View
Video (1033K) |
|
3
|
No Data.
This was a crash for the local news channel. |
View
Video (1069K) |
*note shows that this is a sideswipe by not having
the restitution within the 0-1 values.
The Chevrolet
Cavalier had isolators on both the front and the rear bumpers. Due
to the previous damage on the front of the cavalier only the rear
bumper was used for these tests.
The isolators
on the Chevrolet were measured for stroke distance after each test.
On tests 1-3 only the passenger side isolator was sprayed with Christmas
tree flocking. For tests 4-13 both isolators were foamed as there
was a great difficulty determining the actual stroking for each
test. The Dodge Charger had a foam absorber system. The following
table shows the data for each test.
|
Test
|
Passenger
Side
(mm) |
Driver's
Side
(mm) |
Average
(mm) |
|
1
|
28
|
27
|
27.5
|
|
2
|
27
|
27
|
27
|
|
3
|
26
|
29
|
27.5
|
|
4
|
25
|
25
|
25
|
|
5
|
35
|
35
|
35
|
|
6
|
30
|
30
|
30
|
|
7
|
35
|
35
|
35
|
|
8
|
44
|
47
|
45.5
|
|
9
|
47
|
45
|
46
|
|
10
|
41
|
43
|
42
|
|
11
|
23
|
27
|
25
|
|
12
|
40
|
24
|
32
|
|
13
|
42
|
41
|
41.5
|
|
14
|
No Data
|
This
information is provided for research purposes free of charge. Please
support the ARC Network by becoming
a member. |